An alternative view on life, politics, and computers
Strategies for this campaign season
Published on April 23, 2004 By Calor In Democrat

    George W. Bush is going down this Fall. Well...at least if Kerry is smart enough to put together a campaign strategy based on statistical analysis. Bush is very vulnerable but not in the ways Kerry seems to think.

    Kerry already has the votes of progressives such as myself. We're all motivated to remove Bush. He doesn't need to do too much to mobilize his base. We'd vote for Kerry no matter what. Anyone but Bush is our mantra. On the other hand, I don't think Republicans are as keen on Bush as Democrats are keen on getting rid of Bush. As long as Kerry doesn't seem scary to them, Bush is vulnerable.

    So...how do you get Republicans to not come out for Bush? Let me count the ways.

1) The deficit. Republicans claim to care about fiscal responsibility. But Bush has let spending go out of control. He has both houses in congress so no Reaganesque blaming of those big spending liberals this time. Bush is a big spender. Talk about the pork and out of control spending that our grandchildren are going to have to pay for.

2) Bush's prescription drug program. Point out that Bush isn't for smaller government. He's for inept corporate controlled government. Talk about how he's in favor of helping seniors but as Americans right now we need to come together and get that debt down and then come up with a sensible way to help assure affordable healthcare for all Americans.

3) Talk about how Bush hasn't been honest about his tax cuts. Point out that the top 25 families (not percent) actually received a huge chunk of that tax cut. How does that help America? Tax cuts are fine when you're not running massive deficits and you're not at war.

4) Hit hard about personal responsibility. Bush isn't resolute, he's obtuse. We need leaders that recognize mistakes and make changes. Everyone knows we need more troops in Iraq. Make a big point about as President, I would send more troops in Iraq so that we can quickly establish a secure Democratic Iraq and then take them out to be replaced by International peace keepers and the Iraqi's themselves. Make it clear that ultimately it will be up to the Iraqi's to determine whether they sink or swim. We're not going to do it for them for the next decade in some sort of Vietnam scenario.

5) Really focus on the outsourcing of jobs. America is losing vast parts of its industrial output. Bush talks about this war on terror even as the United States increasingly is becoming incapable of providing for itself in the terms of industrial might or even the raw materials because Bush's policies reward companies for sending jobs to China and India.

    Pick on these 5 points and you'll soften up Bush's base to lower turn out for his side.

 


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 23, 2004
I completely agree that Bush is quite vulnerable to attacks on his lack of fiscal conservatism. I just don't think a majority of voters will be able to cast thei vote for Kerry once they walk into the booth. The man is simply inconsistent. He needs to take a page from Bush himself and shut up so his own words stop tripping him. Of course that still leaves the voting record.
on Apr 23, 2004
This is basically Kerry’s vote in a nutshell, “We want to get rid of that Bush guy that we hate.” I am surprised that a guy can say, “I voted for it before I voted against it,” and still be taken seriously by Americans, especially during a global war against terrorism. Ever notice how people keep calling Kerry the “presumptive nominee” it’s like they can’t believe they are stuck with him, and hopefully someone better will come along. Actually, with the stuff you write Caldor, you should go for the nomination, get up there and run a speech about how Dubya is an imperialist warmonger who is killing kids, fire off rhetoric about how Bush started the war, and how its all his fault. Tim Robbins, Barbara Streisand and all the other Holly weird Kooks would start cheering and opening their purses and bedrooms, they would back you over Kerry.
on Apr 23, 2004
I agree with all you said, and would only like to add that the independent swing voters, although a dimishing group, are who really need to be pampered by the left.
on Apr 24, 2004
What appears to be a direct contradiction to the principals of classical fiscal conservatism is a very cynical end-run attempt to accomplish the same goal. Bleeding the treasury dry will ultimately cause federal programs they couldnt eliminate by legislation to wither and die for lack of funding.
on Apr 24, 2004
kingbee, I think you make a good point. Although Bush's comments to Bob Woodward ("History? We won’t know. We’ll all be dead’.”) suggest he may be a closet Keynesian, heheheh....

"We're all Keynesians now" - Richard M. Nixon
on Apr 24, 2004
I tend to follow the rule that we have to pick the lesser of two evils when it comes to politics and voting. It is true no one is perfect, however I wish that we could have a way for politicians to be totally truthful and stop all the bull(*&%. I definitely don't feel that Bush has the people's best interest at heart in his decision making. It seems when someone becomes president it is their chance to further themselves and not the nation as a whole. Our nation is going down the toilet. There isn't anyone who really wants to change things in a position to do so, it takes money. The rich get richer, the poor get poorer.... its the way of the world.
on Apr 24, 2004
i wonder if people felt the same way when jefferson or jackson were the candidates?
on Apr 24, 2004
Am I the only one who finds it odd that apparently so many people are willing to vote for anyone just to get President Bush out of office? I can understand if they are not happy with the job Mr. Bush has done, but wouldn't it seem to make more sense to elect someone you thought would do a better job, rather than just a warm body?

I've listened for Mr. Kerry's platform and it doesn't seem to consist of anything but (1) George Bush is doing a bad job and (2) Various general platitudes that don't really give the voters a sense of what he specifically would do to improve the country.

I mean, the guy is all over the place on his voting record so it's hard to tell how he would perform when actual bills come up for passage. He seems too concerned with saying the right thing for the current listener or group to get a feel for what he stands for.

I just think when push comes to shove, when people are actually in the voting booth, they are going to be unable to support such an unknown.
on Apr 25, 2004
Am I the only one who finds it odd that apparently so many people are willing to vote for anyone just to get President Bush out of office? I can understand if they are not happy with the job Mr. Bush has done, but wouldn't it seem to make more sense to elect someone you thought would do a better job, rather than just a warm body?


I'm going to have to agree with that. I think it's just plain irresponsible to vote "against" anything. Remember how the US decided "against" communism in the Korean War? A lot of good that did us; what we ended up was something even worse than communism. I'm going to stand by the one who at least is consistent in his actions rather than blindly head in the direction of who-knows-what.

~Buddha
on Apr 25, 2004
South Korea is worse than communism Dan? Or is it that North Korea is *not* communist? Not trying to troll, I just am not sure what you meant there.
on Apr 25, 2004
North Korea was not communist, so we sided with them based on that fact alone.

~Buddha
on Apr 25, 2004
1. Kerry will increase taxes on everyone. I don't care if that takes care of the budget or not. Cutting spending in the House and Congress will cut spending.

2. The prescription drug plan was initially a Democrat proposition. Tort reform and shooting lawyers will cure the health care woes, not Kerry.

3. The top 25 families got a tax cut? Good for them. So did I. It's my money, I busted my ass, and I'll be glad to give it over to defend my country, not to pay for your relatives.

4. Too many feet on the ground makes for confusion. Your lack of faith in our troops and their leaders is worrisome. Marshall plan.

5. More countries are outsourcing to us than we are to them.
on Apr 26, 2004
1. I don't like the deficit, but I don't think we can tax our way out of it. What spending is Kerry going to cut?

2. I didn't agree with this, but I'm sure whatever Kerry comes up with for health care will be more expensive.

3. How has Bush lied about his tax cuts?

4. Where are you going to get international peacekeepers? Draginol had a good article earlier explaining that there isn't a large non-US source of troops that is likely to enter Iraq.

5. I doubt Kerry will stop outsourcing. What policies reward companies for sending jobs to India/China?
on Apr 27, 2004
"Kerry already has the votes of progressives such as myself."

Why do liberals have such a problem with calling themselves liberal? Why obfuscate who you are? Could it be that no one would listen to you if you told the truth? Seems Clinton and Kerry sure are validating that thought.
on Jun 10, 2004
Get Nader Out!
2 Pages1 2