An alternative view on life, politics, and computers
Why Obama is better
Published on September 8, 2008 By Calor In Democrat

For the last 8 years we've seen a President brings new meaning to the term croneyism. Bush may not be an evil man but he's going to go down in history as one of the most inept Presidents of all time.

The complaint about Obama's experience is largely irrelevant. Obama has what it takes to lead this nation. We don't need an administrator, we need a leader and between McCain and Obama the choice is clear. 

McCain's choice of Palin highlights McCain's lack of a consistent vision. Is he a "maverick" or is he just another right wing politician looking to satisify the usual Republican constituents?

Our country has real problems that need to be dealt with and McCain and Palin have no workable answers.

Our health care is a mess. The only ones getting rich off it are insurance companies. There is so much redundancy and inefficiency because of our partially public, partially private health care system that we pay far more for inferior treatment. We can't afford to go back to the days before we had Medicare and Medicaid. These programs work and can be expanded to cover more and more people. Obama is the leader we need to make this happen.

We have no energy policy. The Republican answer is to "drill drill drill". Drilling is a waste of time and money. We have an opportunity to let the market choose a better solution for Americans and for our planet. Sure, wind and solar aren't currently enough on their own. But that won't be a problem in the long run.  When Eisenhower supported an interstate high way system, I don't hear Republicans complain about that. Why not have the government get out in front in getting tidal generators going, wind farms put in, and creating regulations that require commercial builders to install solar paneling on the top of buildings? Combine that with electric and hybrid cars and we could do far more than we ever could than drilling. Obama is the leader who sees this and will take us to this new frontier.

Our economy is a mess. Unemployment is above 6%. Why is that? Because the Republicans in congress and their President threw away a huge surplus with their spending spree and tax cuts that mostly went to the wealthiest Americans. Now the government competes with the private sector for loans to pay for these deficits with more and more coming from China which allows them to outcompete American companies and results in loss jobs. Obama is the leader who will bring us back to pay as you go.

Our foreign policy is a mess. Iran is working on a nuclear program because, thanks to Bush, they know the only way to ensure that we don't invade them is to have a deterrent. Bush showed the world that the USA will invade anybody it doesn't like if they have sufficient natural resources to plunder. Obama is the leader who will restore trust in American world leadership.


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Sep 09, 2008

Though I was intrigued by your article, I think we're all kind of missing the point. And I'm not talking about just the bloggers here that are all about hating on the Democrats. I think everyone in America is too busy with the political side of things to find the best representative. That's waht is broken in our country. So instead of saying, "Republicans=good, Democrats=bad" or vice versa, why don't we look at the individuals running, and not the party they're running under?

P.S. Vote Nader in '08!

I don't vote based on party, I vote based on issues, which is why I could never vote for Nader.   Isn't he the guy who said that income over $100,000/yr should be taxed at 100%.  I wonder how much more than $100,000 he makes a year... does he voluntarily send that in to the IRS?  Does he donate all but $$100,000 to practice what he preaches?  

Somehow, I doubt. ;~D

on Sep 09, 2008

The complaint about Obama's experience is largely irrelevant. Obama has what it takes to lead this nation. We don't need an administrator, we need a leader and between McCain and Obama the choice is clear.

I dont' think it's irrelevant at all.  Obama hasn't shown me anything to even try to convince me that he can lead the nation.  Just going around yelling "change" doesn't mean anything to me. 

Obama has been a community organizer (whatever that means), and he worked very closely with ACORN.  Now just to refresh memeories ACORN is the group who on many occasions have been implicated (and charged I believe) in cases of voter fraud.

Lets also not forget how Obama has typically won elections....by using lawyers.  You know, the thing that the left says Bush did.  Obama is weak is pretty much every aspect whether it be the economy, the war, or pretty much anything in general.

on Sep 10, 2008

Island Dog


The complaint about Obama's experience is largely irrelevant. Obama has what it takes to lead this nation. We don't need an administrator, we need a leader and between McCain and Obama the choice is clear.

I dont' think it's irrelevant at all.  Obama hasn't shown me anything to even try to convince me that he can lead the nation.  Just going around yelling "change" doesn't mean anything to me. 
Obama has been a community organizer (whatever that means), and he worked very closely with ACORN.  Now just to refresh memeories ACORN is the group who on many occasions have been implicated (and charged I believe) in cases of voter fraud.

Lets also not forget how Obama has typically won elections....by using lawyers.  You know, the thing that the left says Bush did.  Obama is weak is pretty much every aspect whether it be the economy, the war, or pretty much anything in general.

Obama's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans who enthusiastically support him. That's leadership. Those who oppose him don't usually discount his ability as a leader but disagree with his political beliefs.

McCain, by contrast, has his side begrudgingly supporting him over purely ideological grounds. McCain hardly inspires or motivates people to support him. Only the desperate choice of Palin has helped at all and that says more of McCain's weakness as a leader than Palin's strengths.

on Sep 10, 2008

Obama's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans who enthusiastically support him.

Eh, no.  That is using flawed logic.  Millions and millions of americans would support a wart hog if one party nominated it to be president. The fact that there have been supporters of "leaders" like Cindy Sheehan, Charles Manson, Jim Jones, etc. show that followers do not convey leadership qualities, only that (and not always true) there are suckers born every minute.

McCain hardly inspires or motivates people to support him.

Also true, and actually another good contradiction of your first statement.  McCain by any definition is a leader.  One who does not mesmerize his followers.  But he has lead, and can lead as he has demonstrated.

on Sep 10, 2008

Obama's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans who enthusiastically support him. That's leadership.

Why?

I thought leadership was telling people what to do and not just have them follow you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCFBndlScBc

 

on Sep 10, 2008

Obama's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans who enthusiastically support him. That's leadership. Those who oppose him don't usually discount his ability as a leader but disagree with his political beliefs.

I really don't see how the "millions" of people following him is relevant to his leadership.  Marketing and public relations maybe, but not leadership.  I would bet serious money that over 90% of his "supporters" don't even know anything about his background or his accomplishments.

Could you even list 3 or 4 of his major accomplishments while in the federal government?

 

on Sep 10, 2008

Obama's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans who enthusiastically support him. That's leadership. Those who oppose him don't usually discount his ability as a leader but disagree with his political beliefs.

McCain, by contrast, has his side begrudgingly supporting him over purely ideological grounds. McCain hardly inspires or motivates people to support him. Only the desperate choice of Palin has helped at all and that says more of McCain's weakness as a leader than Palin's strengths.

and yet in the polls the "enthusiastic support" is running neck and neck with the "desparate choice".

You can't cite millions of enthusiastic supporters as evidence of leadership ability if he isn't doing any better than the guy with who "hardly motivates people".  If Obama was trouncing McCain in the polls (and remember, they were also neck and neck before he announced a running mate) you would have a point, but since he isn't... you don't.

on Sep 10, 2008

Obama's Hitler's leadership is self evident in the millions and millions of Americans Germans who enthusiastically support him.

on Sep 10, 2008

Daiwa I was thinking that very thought.  See we can agree on stuff   Now that's Bipartisan 8-).

Dog, great points as well. Speaking of motivating people I believe Jim Jones motivated a lot of people.  A couple of thousands to drink the kool-aid.  The fact that you're a great public speaker DOES NOT make you a great leader.  Though being a great public orator WILL HELP you being a leader. 

When the terrorist attack and trust me I'm just guessing here that they'll most likely attack once this next President gets elected to see what type of person they are.

There are many historic reasons for them picking Sept 11 (go see for your self and thank France screwing around both times).  They could have done it in 2000.  They were ready and in.  They waited for the next President because they saw (yes they get news in their caves or where ever else they are) the mud being thrown between both parties and thought that the country was all the unified.  Al-Qaeda released videos in 2000 warning the U.S. of coming actions and spoke about the elections in some of them. 

I would like someone to be there if/when (again tapes warning us of coming attacks)attacks occur. 

on Sep 10, 2008

correction to the above: thought the country wasn't all that unified.

on Sep 10, 2008

Daiwa I was thinking that very thought.

Watch out for the blog nazis though. They always like to skewer the ones bringing in the similarities, even it is not germaine to the discussion.

on Sep 10, 2008

Daiwa I was thinking that very thought.

As was I.  This is off-topic, I know, but if you look at it, Hitler was a great leader too.  He was also an evil, evil man.  But the guy had charisma out the ying-yang, and could bring "his people" (the nazi) together like nobody's business.

I think Obama has a lot of good characteristics, but just because he can get people to follow him around chanting doesn't make him a leader; just as McCain's history as a prisoner of war, while it's admirable that he withstood it etc, doesn't make him fit to be president.

Plegh.

on Sep 10, 2008

Cedarbird:

I think Obama has a lot of good characteristics, but just because he can get people to follow him around chanting doesn't make him a leader;

Bara-Krishna, Obama-Rama...  ;~D

just as McCain's history as a prisoner of war, while it's admirable that he withstood it etc, doesn't make him fit to be president.

True, it's the Issues that matter, the issues I say!

on Sep 10, 2008

Borack H. Obama has a half brother,Malik Abongo, a father, a causin by name of Raila Odinga who Obama supported in Kenya SE Africa, plus  other relatives. Where is the story of Obama having duel double citizenship, sniffing coke in college, friends with William Aires, Tony Rezko, or Rev. Wright ,and Ft. Pflager, etc.?Obama has never done anything for the middle class voter before, he's only helped himself. How did he rose to power so quickly? And why are many Islamofascists who are sworn to the destruction of America also actively campaigning for Obama?What"s in it for them?

on Sep 10, 2008

Borack H. Obama has a half brother,Malik Abongo, a father, a causin by name of Raila Odinga who Obama supported in Kenya SE Africa, plus other relatives. Where is the story of Obama having duel double citizenship, sniffing coke in college, friends with William Aires, Tony Rezko, or Rev. Wright ,and Ft. Pflager, etc.?Obama has never done anything for the middle class voter before, he's only helped himself. How did he rose to power so quickly? And why are many Islamofascists who are sworn to the destruction of America also actively campaigning for Obama?What"s in it for them?

Oh, don't you worry your pretty little head.  Those stories came out pretty durn quickly as soon as he came into the spotlight.

How did he rise to power so quickly, you ask?  Voodoo.

3 Pages1 2 3