An alternative view on life, politics, and computers
Acceptance speech merely a rehash
Published on September 5, 2008 By Calor In Democrat

McCain's speech has proven a couple of things. Number one, he is not a great speaker. Number two, his prescription to solve America's ills are to do more of the same.

McCain, who votes with Bush 90 percent of the time, thinks the solution to our problems is to give the rich more money, keep spending the country's blood and treasure in Iraq, and hope everything turns out okay. That's the definition of insane.

McCain calls for lower taxes. Taxes were higher in the 90s and that seemed to work okay. If Bill Gates prefers Obama you have to wonder the wisdom of Republican economic policies.

McCain's experience in Vietnam proves he is made of stern stuff. But no offense but that was nearly 40 years ago. What has he done since?

The only things McCain is really known for since he decided to make "his country his life" was have an affair on the wife that waited for him to be released in order to marry a rich younger woman, accept money from special interest groups, The keating-5 scandal, and the passage of legislation that made possible the 501c political entities that Republicans claim to hate. I know why Democrats don't like him. But why on earth would a Republican want to claim this man? Even on immigration McCain supports policies Republicans don't like. 

John McCain is like the worst of both worlds. He's an economic disaster with misguided foreign policy judgment. After 8 years of cowboy diplomacy, record deficits, and mounting economic stress, we have had enough. It is time for change.


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Sep 08, 2008

Props to you t_P_P.

on Sep 08, 2008

Props to you t_P_P.

Ditto!

on Sep 08, 2008

The Author states that McCain has voted for Bush 90% (this is a wrong percentage) yet he has gone against his party 33% of the time before. Obama since becoming a senator has nearly 100% of the time voted with his party which leaves oh about .01% of the time against his party. You can see this at the congressional quarterly voting study.

McCain himself said he was proud to vote with Bush 90% of the time.  That would represent what we have had the last 8 years.  I think Obama's point is that, that is not change.  He has voted with his party 96% of the time, his party and him representing the change.  His party representing the change in policy/platform and Obama himself representing the change in Washington politics and that of getting rid of the broken system we have there where special interests and PAC's rule.

on Sep 08, 2008

He has voted with his party 96% of the time, his party and him representing the change.

So that's what we've had the past 2 years?  Change?

on Sep 08, 2008

A majority of 51/49 in the Senate really doesn't help to get legislation passed after veto.  2/3 votes is a little tough to come by with the partisan bickering.  I agree that the new seats in Congress have done little to change how things are happening, but regardless, there needs to be more compromising in the houses and less complaining to the tune of "our side is right, your side is wrong".  Also, we could all do without the ridiculous provisions trying to be snuck into every single piece of important legislature which causes even more chaos and less progress -- on every side of the picture.

on Sep 08, 2008

So that's what we've had the past 2 years? Change?

no can you say veto and not enough of a majority

on Sep 08, 2008

Excuse me?  Bush has vetoed 12 bills during his entire 8 years in office, 3 of which were overridden by Congress, at least 2 of them this year.  Where are you getting your information?

on Sep 08, 2008

I meant he has veto power and the dems dont have a majority.  Sorry wasnt real clear on that one.  But didnt he have only 1 veto in the first 6 years? 

 

 

on Sep 08, 2008

The 12 bills in 2006-2008, you mean?  Take a look at some of his statements regarding the vetoes that were overridden.  You can see where the Congress can actually do some good to help the people when they work together to get things changed for the better.  I don't agree with this whole, change things to "Democrat" because it is better; sounds kind of self-absorbed.  I agree with change in how government acts and reacts with the nation and between parties.  Luckily both candidates seem to offer something to that tone.  Although I still disagree with many of McCain's platforms, he wouldn't be the end of the world (I would just be highly disappointed and tempted to move to Canada )

on Sep 08, 2008

Daiwa,

I understand that McCain states that in an ad which is sponsored by Obama.  I'm not sure where they cut and spliced to get. I'm not say that they are the only ones that do. IT IS A POLITICAL AD, how many actually get the facts 100% accurate.  I can say is that I AM GETTING MY FACTS FROM A LEGIT PLACE AND NOT PULLING THEM OUT OF MY ARSE.  Google congression quarterly voting study. 

Obama has voted with HIS PARTY all the time 100%.  The Democrats have been in power for 3 years where is this stinkin change that you're talking about?  Obama claims that he'll be bipartisan.  Yeah since he's been a senator for the short time he has he's been bipartisan exactly .01%.  Again google that website.

Bipartisan means the cooperative efforts of both major political parties to pass legislation or address issues in the national interest.  McCain has gone against his party 33% of the time. 

Just for the record I DON'T LIKE EITHER CANDIDATE!  But I like even less MOONCALVES botching figures!

on Sep 08, 2008

Obama has voted with HIS PARTY all the time 100%.

That is incorrect. Its in the high 90's but not 100%

McCain has gone against his party 33% of the time

This is also incorrect...Somewhere in the low teens.

on Sep 08, 2008

Your own legit place indicates a 96% voting with party rate for Obama, not your 100% claim.  Stick to your "legit place", it will help with your "peoples' arguments".  http://www.cqpolitics.com/cq-assets/cqmultimedia/flash/votestudy/index.html

It also mentions McCain voting 81% with his party over the years of the current President Bush with 90% presidential support.  McCain has also been in the senate since 1987 through various demographics in the congress and presidency...plenty more opportunities to practice bi-partisan efforts.  When the political agenda and country is divided so much, these politicians now will try every opportunity they get to push party initiatives along the path from legislation to law.

on Sep 09, 2008

Daiwa,

I understand that McCain states that in an ad which is sponsored by Obama. I'm not sure where they cut and spliced to get. I'm not say that they are the only ones that do. IT IS A POLITICAL AD, how many actually get the facts 100% accurate. I can say is that I AM GETTING MY FACTS FROM A LEGIT PLACE AND NOT PULLING THEM OUT OF MY ARSE. Google congression quarterly voting study.

I think you may have mistaken my comment as a reply to you, t_P_P - it was a response to Mooseplow.

on Sep 09, 2008

Although I still disagree with many of McCain's platforms, he wouldn't be the end of the world (I would just be highly disappointed and tempted to move to Canada )

A voice of sanity!

That is incorrect. Its in the high 90's but not 100%

name the times he has voted against his party and for Bush.

 

on Sep 09, 2008

Dear Smooth Seas and Kurtin,

First,  I am not delusioned enough to support either party 100% nor am I a NINNYHAMMER to support a third party.  Please your insult Kurtin has no effect on me because I am not a product of the machine.  I strongly feel that this country really does need a multiple party system because BOTH parties eventually do the same thing with very minor differences.

Onto the accusations.  First the accusation that he did not vote 33% of the time against his party.  Go to the year 2001, now if someone only votes x% for their party the that means the reminder y% is essentially him aligning with the other side.  Its math.  I am a stat researcher.

If you really did go to the website I gave then you'll see that McCain voted with bush 77% of the time in 2005.

I admit that I was exaggerating my 100% figure.  I also gave you the website to go to.  Unlike most political ads that will say he voted 95% of the time.  Which makes you think that McCain voted with Bush all time at least 95% of the time.

p.s.  Kurtin, the point is Obama has voted almost exclusively with his party.  He falls into the category of 'voting trend' especially if you vote high 90s with your party for all of your senate career.   I am only talking within these 8 years for McCain.  Yes granted if went all the way back to the early 90s and crunched those numbers I'm sure that I could bring out other numbers.

p.p.s I am glad you went to the website enjoy the truth.

 

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5